Read about the Academy Experience
08/02/2011: Mock Trial at Fordham University
Posted by Administrator on July 14, 2011 at 5:19 PM EDT
In Pursuit of Law & Order
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of mock trials held in the U.S. annually. That's a staggering number, and there is good reason for all of this practice.
Because mock trials are structured much like real court trials and are bound by the same rules, they give participants and observers direct knowledge of the judicial system. Mock trials introduce students to the roles and functions of different people involved in a court case: judges, lawyers, witnesses, etc. They also acquaint students with legal procedures such as opening statements, direct examinations, cross-examinations, and closing arguments. Mock trials are especially useful for preparing students for legal careers.
The Baruch Leadership Academy's mock trial was held at the Fordham University School of Law's mock courtroom. Students tried a criminal case, which means a crime was committed, as opposed to a civil case in which a resolution to a legal dispute between two parties is sought. In the Leadership Academy's mock case, a woman died after being thrown from a vehicle in an accident. The driver was subsequently accused of criminal negligence for not ensuring all of the passengers in the car were properly secured.
Students participated as prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, and witnesses in the practice trial. A real Supreme Court Judge presided over the procedures and shared in the students' courtroom drama. The prosecution argued that the defendant was aware of and should be held accountable for his actions. The defense argued that the prosecution's evidence was weak and insubstantial. Additionally, the defense contended that exterior forces, such as an absent minded pedestrian and flawed vehicle construction, were to blame for the victim's death.
After witnesses were called, testimony was heard, and the cross-examinations were performed, the judge deliberated. She did not make a ruling. Rather, she stated her professional opinion. Given the circumstances and evidence of the case, she thought the defendant would be ruled not guilty.






